PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCDS vs. SMCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCDS vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCDS

1D
1.17%
1M
6.33%
YTD
23.60%
6M
24.35%
1Y
46.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMCP

1D
1.02%
1M
-25.77%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDS vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCDS and SMCP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026

0.24

SCDS vs. SMCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCDS
SMCP

Technology

20.8%
11.1%

Financial Services

14.7%
98.8%

Industrials

14.6%
13.1%

Healthcare

11.0%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.3%

Real Estate

4.9%
3.1%

Energy

3.9%
7.6%

Basic Materials

3.2%
7.9%

Utilities

2.4%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
8.1%

Communication Services

1.6%
4.0%

Technology

SCDS
20.8%
SMCP
11.1%

Financial Services

SCDS
14.7%
SMCP
98.8%

Industrials

SCDS
14.6%
SMCP
13.1%

Healthcare

SCDS
11.0%
SMCP
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCDS
10.7%
SMCP
7.3%

Real Estate

SCDS
4.9%
SMCP
3.1%

Energy

SCDS
3.9%
SMCP
7.6%

Basic Materials

SCDS
3.2%
SMCP
7.9%

Utilities

SCDS
2.4%
SMCP
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCDS
2.2%
SMCP
8.1%

Communication Services

SCDS
1.6%
SMCP
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCDS vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDS
SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDS vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCDSSMCPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.30

SCDS vs. SMCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCDSSMCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

-1.43

+2.56

Drawdowns

SCDS vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SMCP drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and SMCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCDSSMCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.71%

-27.86%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-25.77%

+25.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-5.07%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

Volatility

SCDS vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCDSSMCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

43.91%

-25.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

43.91%

-22.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

43.91%

-22.69%

SCDS vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCDS vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison

SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCDS and SMCP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.

SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and AlphaMark Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.90% for SMCP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCDS and SMCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer