SCDS vs. SMCP
SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) and SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SCDS is actively managed, while SMCP is passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCDS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SMCP.
Performance
SCDS vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCDS
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 6M
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- 46.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCP
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -25.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDS vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 13.74% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | -25.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDS and SMCP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.24 |
SCDS vs. SMCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCDS
SMCP
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
SCDS
SMCP
Financial Services
SCDS
SMCP
Industrials
SCDS
SMCP
Healthcare
SCDS
SMCP
Consumer Cyclical
SCDS
SMCP
Real Estate
SCDS
SMCP
Energy
SCDS
SMCP
Basic Materials
SCDS
SMCP
Utilities
SCDS
SMCP
Consumer Defensive
SCDS
SMCP
Communication Services
SCDS
SMCP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDS vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank
SCDS
SMCP
SCDS vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCDS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCDS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | -1.43 | +2.56 |
Drawdowns
SCDS vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SMCP drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and SMCP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.71% | -27.86% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -25.77% | +25.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -5.07% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | — | — |
Volatility
SCDS vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDS | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 43.91% | -25.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 43.91% | -22.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 43.91% | -22.69% |
SCDS vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDS vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison
SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.91% | 1.15% | 0.42% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDS and SMCP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.
SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and AlphaMark Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.90% for SMCP.
Find the right allocation for SCDS and SMCP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer