SCDS vs. CAOS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCDS returned 40.88% vs 1.73% for CAOS. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SCDS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

SCDS vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDS achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.

SCDS

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.91%
• 6M: 17.80%
• YTD: 25.21%
• 1Y: 40.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.53%

CAOS

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.01%
• 6M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 1Y: 1.73%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	$6.81M	$5.39M	$5.09M
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	$154.38K	$83.77K	$106.90K

SCDS vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	25.21%	11.27%	7.26%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.76%	2.55%	1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDS and CAOS is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024	-0.32

Return for Risk

SCDS vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 89
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 56
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCDS vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCDS	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.19	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	1.89	+1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.24	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	2.47	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.32	5.45	+9.88

SCDS vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDS and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCDS vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDS	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.71%	-3.89%	-22.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-0.76%	-8.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-1.13%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-0.92%	-4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	0.34%	+2.19%

Volatility

SCDS vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that SCDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCDS	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	0.51%	+3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.46%	1.07%	+12.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.40%	1.57%	+16.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	4.18%	+16.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.86%	4.18%	+16.68%

SCDS vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCDS vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.92%	1.15%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCDS and CAOS in my portfolio?

SCDS and CAOS have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCDS or CAOS?

SCDS has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDS dropped -26.71% vs CAOS's -3.89%.

Which ETF is better, SCDS or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 40.88% vs 1.73% for CAOS. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCDS or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 40.88% return vs 1.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCDS or CAOS?

SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCDS or CAOS?

SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between SCDS and CAOS?

SCDS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.