PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCDS vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCDS vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDS achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 9.70% return.


SCDS

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.91%
6M
17.80%
YTD
25.21%
1Y
40.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.53%

BBUS

1D
0.73%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.38%
YTD
9.70%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.56M$23.62M$29.53M
$154.38K$83.77K$106.90K

SCDS vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF
25.21%11.27%7.26%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
9.70%17.77%14.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDS and BBUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024

0.80

The correlation between SCDS and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCDS vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCDS
BBUS

Financial Services

17.7%
11.6%

Healthcare

17.5%
8.9%

Technology

14.6%
38.7%

Industrials

12.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
9.4%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.7%

Energy

4.4%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.4%

Utilities

2.8%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.1%
9.9%

Financial Services

SCDS
17.7%
BBUS
11.6%

Healthcare

SCDS
17.5%
BBUS
8.9%

Technology

SCDS
14.6%
BBUS
38.7%

Industrials

SCDS
12.8%
BBUS
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCDS
10.5%
BBUS
9.4%

Real Estate

SCDS
6.1%
BBUS
1.7%

Energy

SCDS
4.4%
BBUS
3.0%

Basic Materials

SCDS
4.2%
BBUS
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

SCDS
2.9%
BBUS
4.4%

Utilities

SCDS
2.8%
BBUS
2.2%

Communication Services

SCDS
2.1%
BBUS
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCDS vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCDS
SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCDS vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCDSBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

2.05

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.32

8.63

+6.69

SCDS vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDS and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCDS vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCDSBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.71%

-35.35%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-9.21%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-1.55%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.38%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.19%

+0.34%

Volatility

SCDS vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.54%. This indicates that SCDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCDSBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.54%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

10.14%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.40%

12.89%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

17.15%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

19.50%

+1.36%

SCDS vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCDS vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
SCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF
0.92%1.15%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCDS and BBUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCDS has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to BBUS (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDS dropped -26.71% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 40.88% vs 20.80% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 40.88% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.92% for SCDS.

SCDS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.02% for BBUS.

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCDS and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer