PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCDS vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCDS vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDS achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 11.43% return.


SCDS

1D
1.17%
1M
6.33%
YTD
23.60%
6M
24.35%
1Y
46.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
0.21%
1M
5.50%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.70%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDS vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF
23.60%11.27%7.26%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.43%17.77%11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDS and BBUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024

0.81

The correlation between SCDS and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCDS vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCDS
BBUS

Technology

20.8%
37.1%

Financial Services

14.7%
10.8%

Industrials

14.6%
7.2%

Healthcare

11.0%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.4%

Real Estate

4.9%
1.7%

Energy

3.9%
3.2%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

1.6%
10.8%

Technology

SCDS
20.8%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

SCDS
14.7%
BBUS
10.8%

Industrials

SCDS
14.6%
BBUS
7.2%

Healthcare

SCDS
11.0%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCDS
10.7%
BBUS
9.4%

Real Estate

SCDS
4.9%
BBUS
1.7%

Energy

SCDS
3.9%
BBUS
3.2%

Basic Materials

SCDS
3.2%
BBUS
1.2%

Utilities

SCDS
2.4%
BBUS
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

SCDS
2.2%
BBUS
4.5%

Communication Services

SCDS
1.6%
BBUS
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCDS vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDS
SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDS vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCDSBBUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

2.47

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

3.36

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

3.24

+2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.30

14.92

+3.38

SCDS vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDS and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCDSBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.47

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.84

+0.29

Drawdowns

SCDS vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCDSBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.71%

-35.35%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-9.21%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-5.46%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.00%

+0.54%

Volatility

SCDS vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.77%. This indicates that SCDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCDSBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

2.77%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

8.94%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

11.85%

+6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

17.03%

+4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

19.59%

+1.63%

SCDS vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCDS vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than BBUS's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
SCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF
0.91%1.15%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCDS and BBUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCDS has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to BBUS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDS dropped -26.71% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 46.17% vs 29.15% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 46.17% return vs 29.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.91% for SCDS.

SCDS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.02% for BBUS.

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCDS and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer