SCDL vs. NTSD
SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SCDL is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
SCDL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 37.06%
- 6M
- 35.80%
- 1Y
- 50.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 12.39% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDL and NTSD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
SCDL
NTSD
SCDL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 5.08 | -4.55 |
Drawdowns
SCDL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDL drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -5.20% | -29.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -1.11% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -0.84% | -11.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | — | — |
Volatility
SCDL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | 24.28% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 24.28% | +4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 24.28% | +4.61% |
SCDL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCDL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.
SCDL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCDL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for SCDL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer