PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCDL vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCDL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCDL

1D
0.51%
1M
5.01%
YTD
37.06%
6M
35.80%
1Y
50.97%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCDL and NTSD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCDL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDL
SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCDLNTSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

SCDL vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCDLNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

5.08

-4.55

Drawdowns

SCDL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDL drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDL and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCDLNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-5.20%

-29.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-1.11%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-0.84%

-11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

Volatility

SCDL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCDLNTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

24.28%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.02%

24.28%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.89%

24.28%

+4.61%

SCDL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCDL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SCDL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SCDL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.

SCDL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCDL and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCDL and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer