SCDL vs. GMMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) and GMMF (iShares Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%), while GMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by iShares. SCDL is passively managed, while GMMF is actively managed. Over the past year, SCDL returned 50.97% vs 3.87% for GMMF. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SCDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GMMF.

Performance

SCDL vs. GMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDL achieves a 37.06% return, which is significantly higher than GMMF's 1.47% return.

SCDL

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 37.06%
• 6M: 35.80%
• 1Y: 50.97%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: 9.40%
• 10Y*: —

GMMF

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDL vs. GMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	37.06%	-1.92%
GMMF iShares Government Money Market ETF	1.47%	3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDL and GMMF is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

SCDL vs. GMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDL

SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 73
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 68

GMMF

GMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100
GMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDL vs. GMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCDL	GMMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	17.52	-15.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	86.57	-83.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	24.81	-23.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.03	129.87	-124.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.65	1,318.32	-1,305.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCDL vs. GMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the GMMF Sharpe Ratio of 17.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDL and GMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCDL	GMMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	17.52	-15.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	16.34	-15.81

Drawdowns

SCDL vs. GMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDL drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than GMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDL and GMMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDL	GMMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.87%	-0.03%	-34.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-0.03%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.79%	0.00%	-2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-0.00%	-11.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	0.00%	+4.04%

Volatility

SCDL vs. GMMF - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) at 0.06%. This indicates that SCDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCDL	GMMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	0.06%	+5.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.82%	0.14%	+14.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.66%	0.22%	+21.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.02%	0.24%	+28.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.89%	0.24%	+28.65%

SCDL vs. GMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GMMF's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCDL vs. GMMF - Dividend Comparison

SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%.

Position	TTM	2025
GMMF iShares Government Money Market ETF	3.67%	3.45%
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCDL and GMMF in my portfolio?

SCDL and GMMF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCDL or GMMF?

SCDL has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to GMMF (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDL dropped -34.87% vs GMMF's -0.03%.

Which ETF is better, SCDL or GMMF?

On 1-year performance, SCDL leads with 50.97% vs 3.87% for GMMF. On fees, GMMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GMMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCDL or GMMF?

Over the 1-year period, SCDL has performed better with a 50.97% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCDL or GMMF?

GMMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCDL or GMMF?

GMMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.

What is the main difference between SCDL and GMMF?

SCDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GMMF is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCDL and 0.20% for GMMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.52 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.