SCCR vs. JUCY
SCCR (Schwab Core Bond ETF) and JUCY (Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCCR returned 5.16% vs 6.79% for JUCY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCCR charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for JUCY.
Performance
SCCR vs. JUCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than JUCY's 2.53% return.
SCCR
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUCY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCCR vs. JUCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF | 0.52% | 7.00% |
JUCY Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF | 2.53% | 4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCCR and JUCY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCCR vs. JUCY — Risk / Return Rank
SCCR
JUCY
SCCR vs. JUCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCCR | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 7.27 | -5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 28.21 | -22.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCCR vs. JUCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, which is greater than JUCY's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and JUCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCCR | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -1.56% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -0.94% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -0.59% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.32% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.24% | +0.75% |
Volatility
SCCR vs. JUCY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) is 1.06%, while Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that SCCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JUCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCCR | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.24% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 2.37% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 3.58% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 3.35% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 3.35% | +1.02% |
SCCR vs. JUCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than JUCY's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCCR vs. JUCY - Dividend Comparison
SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than JUCY's 8.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUCY Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF | 8.26% | 7.98% | 7.83% | 9.31% | 0.58% |
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF | 4.62% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCCR and JUCY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JUCY has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to SCCR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs JUCY's -1.56%.
On 1-year performance, JUCY leads with 6.79% vs 5.16% for SCCR. On fees, SCCR is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, SCCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JUCY has performed better with a 6.79% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCCR is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JUCY.
JUCY has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 4.62% for SCCR.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.60% for JUCY.
JUCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCCR and JUCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer