SCCPX vs. JMABX
SCCPX (Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund) and JMABX (John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SCCPX returned -2.58%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for JMABX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCCPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for JMABX.
Performance
SCCPX vs. JMABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCCPX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than JMABX's 0.38% return.
SCCPX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 5.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- -2.58%
- 10Y*
- 22.01%
JMABX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SCCPX vs. JMABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | 0.53% | 6.37% | -1.68% | 9.20% | -23.65% | -0.01% | 625.95% | 3.13% |
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio | 0.38% | 8.88% | 4.42% | 8.05% | -15.50% | 0.33% | 7.74% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCCPX and JMABX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SCCPX and JMABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCCPX vs. JMABX — Risk / Return Rank
SCCPX
JMABX
SCCPX vs. JMABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCCPX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.32 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.08 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.65 | 7.26 | -4.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCCPX vs. JMABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCCPX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than JMABX's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCPX and JMABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCCPX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -21.48% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.49% | -2.89% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.96% | -5.71% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -21.48% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -1.08% | -12.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -6.14% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 0.83% | +1.37% |
Volatility
SCCPX vs. JMABX - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) at 1.09%. This indicates that SCCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCCPX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 1.09% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.58% | 2.64% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.59% | 3.58% | +4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 5.53% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.29% | 5.86% | +176.43% |
SCCPX vs. JMABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCCPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JMABX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCCPX vs. JMABX - Dividend Comparison
SCCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than JMABX's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio | 5.64% | 5.59% | 5.26% | 3.59% | 3.28% | 3.99% | 2.74% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | 5.12% | 4.99% | 4.84% | 3.54% | 4.11% | 13.93% | 88.30% | 3.01% | 3.31% | 3.76% | 3.41% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCCPX and JMABX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCCPX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to JMABX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCPX dropped -31.88% vs JMABX's -21.48%.
JMABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCCPX and JMABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer