SCCO vs. ESLT
SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation) and ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) are both stocks. SCCO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while ESLT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SCCO returned 27.50%/yr vs 26.53%/yr for ESLT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCCO vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCCO achieves a 36.04% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 48.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCCO having a 27.50% annualized return and ESLT not far behind at 26.53%.
SCCO
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 36.04%
- 6M
- 37.05%
- 1Y
- 110.19%
- 3Y*
- 44.36%
- 5Y*
- 29.82%
- 10Y*
- 27.50%
ESLT
- 1D
- -6.48%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 48.00%
- 6M
- 66.16%
- 1Y
- 98.98%
- 3Y*
- 60.86%
- 5Y*
- 46.38%
- 10Y*
- 26.53%
SCCO vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 36.04% | 66.62% | 9.45% | 50.12% | 4.25% | -0.62% | 58.79% | 46.59% | -33.11% | 50.79% |
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 48.00% | 125.14% | 22.17% | 31.30% | -4.82% | 34.77% | -14.56% | 37.62% | -13.22% | 32.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCCO and ESLT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 1996 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SCCO and ESLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SCCO:
$155.95B
ESLT:
$41.10B
SCCO:
$6.04
ESLT:
$12.36
SCCO:
31.44
ESLT:
69.08
SCCO:
4.34
ESLT:
3.27
SCCO:
10.73
ESLT:
4.93
SCCO:
13.23
ESLT:
9.65
SCCO:
$14.55B
ESLT:
$8.23B
SCCO:
$6.04B
ESLT:
$2.03B
SCCO:
$8.80B
ESLT:
$861.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCCO vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank
SCCO
ESLT
SCCO vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCCO | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 3.83 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | 10.61 | -0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCCO vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCCO drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCO and ESLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCCO | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -53.79% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.22% | -25.98% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.69% | -25.98% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.07% | -32.89% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.83% | -32.89% | -21.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.95% | -15.71% | +3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -13.91% | -8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.59% | 9.36% | +1.23% |
Volatility
SCCO vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) have volatilities of 20.20% and 19.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCCO | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.20% | 19.89% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.65% | 35.93% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.66% | 44.11% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.97% | 33.66% | +6.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.55% | 29.42% | +8.13% |
Dividends
SCCO vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison
SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than ESLT's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 0.36% | 0.47% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.63% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 1.93% | 2.13% | 2.29% | 4.65% | 5.80% | 5.19% | 2.30% | 4.81% | 4.55% | 1.24% | 0.56% | 1.30% |
Financials
SCCO vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southern Copper Corporation and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCCO vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison
SCCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ESLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.
SCCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.3%.
ESLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
SCCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 37.1%.
ESLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCCO and ESLT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCCO has higher volatility (20.20%) compared to ESLT (19.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCO dropped -78.60% vs ESLT's -53.79%.
ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCCO and ESLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer