PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCCIX vs. HRCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCIX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than HRCPX's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SCCIX has underperformed HRCPX with an annualized return of 2.37%, while HRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.85% annualized return.


SCCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
2.37%

HRCPX

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.57%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.54%
1Y
33.82%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
17.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCCIX
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund
0.50%7.63%1.45%5.41%-13.22%-1.96%15.39%7.96%1.24%3.40%
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
11.31%23.00%35.17%39.55%-29.18%30.55%28.89%31.50%-7.37%31.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCIX and HRCPX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

-0.09

The correlation between SCCIX and HRCPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCCIX vs. HRCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCIX
SCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HRCPX
HRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCCIXHRCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

2.24

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

2.99

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.59

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.09

9.67

-3.58

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the HRCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCIX and HRCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCCIXHRCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.24

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.80

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.84

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.60

-0.15

Drawdowns

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum HRCPX drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCIX and HRCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCCIXHRCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-56.83%

+34.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-13.43%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.40%

-23.28%

+15.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-31.75%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.25%

-31.85%

+12.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.39%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-9.16%

+5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

3.59%

-2.62%

Volatility

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) is 1.44%, while Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that SCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCCIXHRCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

3.59%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

11.63%

-8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

15.59%

-11.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

21.43%

-15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.19%

21.20%

-16.01%

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HRCPX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCCIX vs. HRCPX - Dividend Comparison

SCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than HRCPX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
3.70%4.11%12.74%11.75%21.31%6.96%15.23%1.57%10.41%6.44%6.36%15.16%
SCCIX
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund
4.30%4.34%4.39%3.82%2.36%1.13%3.13%4.39%2.26%1.75%3.86%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCCIX and HRCPX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRCPX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to SCCIX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCIX dropped -22.19% vs HRCPX's -56.83%.

HRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCCIX and HRCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer