SCCIX vs. SUBFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SCCIX (Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund) and SUBFX (Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SCCIX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds, while SUBFX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds. Over the past 10 years, SCCIX returned 2.37%/yr vs 3.93%/yr for SUBFX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCCIX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SUBFX.

Performance

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCIX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than SUBFX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCCIX has underperformed SUBFX with an annualized return of 2.37%, while SUBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.93% annualized return.

SCCIX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 5.92%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: 0.17%
• 10Y*: 2.37%

SUBFX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 6.44%
• 5Y*: 3.55%
• 10Y*: 3.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCCIX Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund	0.50%	7.63%	1.45%	5.41%	-13.22%	-1.96%	15.39%	7.96%	1.24%	3.40%
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund	0.79%	10.61%	4.22%	8.53%	-4.74%	-0.32%	11.18%	6.52%	0.53%	2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCIX and SUBFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011	0.53

Over the past year, SCCIX and SUBFX have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SCCIX vs. SUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCIX

SCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 23
SCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SUBFX

SUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 42
SUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCCIX	SUBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.74	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.60	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.64	-0.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	10.26	-4.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the SUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCIX and SUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCCIX	SUBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.74	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.65	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.75	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.95	-0.50

Drawdowns

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than SUBFX's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCIX and SUBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCIX	SUBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-11.22%	-10.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	-2.34%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.40%	-4.88%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.25%	-11.17%	-7.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.25%	-11.22%	-8.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.04%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-1.46%	-2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.60%	+0.37%

Volatility

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) have volatilities of 1.44% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCIX	SUBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	1.51%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.95%	2.78%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.17%	3.43%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.35%	5.49%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.19%	5.29%	-0.10%

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SUBFX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCCIX vs. SUBFX - Dividend Comparison

SCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than SUBFX's 6.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCCIX Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund	4.30%	4.34%	4.39%	3.82%	2.36%	1.13%	3.13%	4.39%	2.26%	1.75%	3.86%	1.66%
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund	6.06%	6.44%	4.92%	4.52%	2.16%	1.96%	3.01%	2.83%	2.06%	1.17%	1.01%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCIX and SUBFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SCCIX and SUBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCCIX or SUBFX?

SUBFX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to SCCIX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCIX dropped -22.19% vs SUBFX's -11.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.