SCC vs. QTJL
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SCC is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCC returned -14.68%/yr vs 9.06%/yr for QTJL. Their -0.79 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
SCC vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 2.56% return.
SCC
- 1D
- -6.23%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- -15.16%
- 3Y*
- -20.88%
- 5Y*
- -14.68%
- 10Y*
- -24.58%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.78%
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 11.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $200.88K | $354.66K | $247.25K | |
| $353.66K | $227.58K | $240.11K |
SCC vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.71% | -18.97% | -36.01% | -44.34% | 64.09% | -8.32% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 2.56% | 21.07% | 16.50% | 42.39% | -30.16% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and QTJL is -0.66, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | -0.79 |
The correlation between SCC and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from -0.79 (all time) to -0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
QTJL
SCC vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.18 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.23 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 6.04 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -33.40% | -66.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -8.48% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -22.43% | -44.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | -33.40% | -43.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -4.62% | -95.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.05% | -7.74% | -78.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.80% | 1.73% | +15.07% |
Volatility
SCC vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) has a higher volatility of 13.88% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 6.45%. This indicates that SCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.88% | 6.45% | +7.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.01% | 9.63% | +20.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.04% | 11.72% | +27.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.54% | 20.43% | +24.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 20.30% | +19.37% |
SCC vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCC vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.46% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and QTJL have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCC has higher volatility (13.88%) compared to QTJL (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 5-year performance, QTJL leads with 9.06% vs -14.68% for SCC. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 9.06% return vs -14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCC.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCC and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer