SCC vs. NRGU
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SCC tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%) while NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCC returned -15.16% vs 166.43% for NRGU. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCC vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 157.14% return.
SCC
- 1D
- -6.23%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- -15.16%
- 3Y*
- -20.88%
- 5Y*
- -14.68%
- 10Y*
- -24.58%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.78%
NRGU
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 51.26%
- 6M
- 91.25%
- YTD
- 157.14%
- 1Y
- 166.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 50.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.57M | $4.13M | $3.95M | |
| $353.66K | $227.58K | $240.11K |
SCC vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.71% | -17.72% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 157.14% | -30.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and NRGU is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, SCC and NRGU have become more correlated (0.23) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
NRGU
SCC vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.29 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.38 | -3.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 7.59 | -8.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and NRGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -57.50% | -42.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -43.89% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -11.31% | -88.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.05% | -25.74% | -60.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.80% | 19.55% | -2.75% |
Volatility
SCC vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) is 13.88%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 22.83%. This indicates that SCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.88% | 22.83% | -8.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.01% | 64.33% | -34.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.04% | 77.39% | -38.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.54% | 88.47% | -43.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 88.47% | -48.80% |
SCC vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCC and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCC vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.46% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and NRGU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRGU has higher volatility (22.83%) compared to SCC (13.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs NRGU's -57.50%.
On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 166.43% vs -15.16% for SCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SCC has been the lower-risk option at 13.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 166.43% return vs -15.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCC and NRGU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.
SCC tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO.
NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and NRGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer