SCC vs. LINT
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SCC is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. SCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
SCC vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.
SCC
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- -12.48%
- 3Y*
- -21.64%
- 5Y*
- -14.17%
- 10Y*
- -24.95%
LINT
- 1D
- -12.86%
- 1M
- 11.99%
- YTD
- 744.89%
- 6M
- 773.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCC vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 8.21% | -11.45% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 744.89% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and LINT is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCC vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -49.54% | -50.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -12.86% | -87.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.97% | -20.48% | -65.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.30% | — | — |
Volatility
SCC vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.09% | 168.83% | -131.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 168.83% | -124.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 168.83% | -129.16% |
SCC vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCC vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.10% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 4.35% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and LINT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCC and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for SCC and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer