SCC vs. BITU
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCC returned -15.43% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCC vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.
SCC
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- -15.43%
- 3Y*
- -25.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.79%
- 10Y*
- -25.08%
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCC vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.99% | -18.97% | -35.52% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and BITU is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
BITU
SCC vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCC | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | -0.84 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | -1.44 | +1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.93 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | -1.47 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCC | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | -0.84 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | -0.35 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SCC vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -78.94% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.02% | -78.94% | +49.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -78.94% | -20.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.95% | -34.49% | -51.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.21% | 49.84% | -30.63% |
Volatility
SCC vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) is 10.71%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that SCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 18.99% | -8.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 69.41% | -43.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.34% | 87.00% | -50.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 97.45% | -53.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 97.45% | -57.93% |
SCC vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCC and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCC vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 4.53% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and BITU have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to SCC (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs BITU's -78.94%.
On 1-year performance, SCC leads with -15.43% vs -73.07% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SCC has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCC has performed better with a -15.43% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCC and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 4.53% for SCC.
SCC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. SCC tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
SCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer