PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCATX vs. FOKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCATX achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than FOKFX's 28.00% return.


SCATX

1D
-0.34%
1M
9.53%
YTD
6.19%
6M
3.98%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
17.53%

FOKFX

1D
0.90%
1M
11.67%
YTD
28.00%
6M
26.89%
1Y
59.16%
3Y*
32.88%
5Y*
18.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCATX
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund
6.19%10.22%35.81%65.58%-55.30%-9.93%119.67%2.09%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
28.00%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SCATX and FOKFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.84

The correlation between SCATX and FOKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCATX vs. FOKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCATX
SCATX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SCATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCATX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SCATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCATX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCATXFOKFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

3.27

-2.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

4.07

-3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.54

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

4.82

-4.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.94

19.97

-19.03

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCATX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the FOKFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCATX and FOKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCATXFOKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

3.27

-2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.81

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.96

-0.54

Drawdowns

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCATX drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than FOKFX's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCATX and FOKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCATXFOKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.92%

-37.26%

-29.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.17%

-12.53%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.26%

-24.81%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-37.26%

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.79%

0.00%

-9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.86%

-9.20%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.04%

3.01%

+7.03%

Volatility

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCATXFOKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.62%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

14.55%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

18.45%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.00%

23.01%

+12.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.65%

24.63%

+8.02%

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCATX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FOKFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCATX vs. FOKFX - Dividend Comparison

SCATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FOKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.28%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCATX
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.18%10.09%18.59%7.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCATX and FOKFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCATX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to FOKFX (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCATX dropped -66.92% vs FOKFX's -37.26%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCATX and FOKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer