SCAP vs. SMCF
SCAP (Infracap Small Cap Income ETF) and SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. SCAP is actively managed, while SMCF is passively managed. Over the past year, SCAP returned 27.11% vs 32.87% for SMCF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCAP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SMCF.
Performance
SCAP vs. SMCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCAP achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly lower than SMCF's 13.75% return.
SCAP
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCF
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCAP vs. SMCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCAP Infracap Small Cap Income ETF | 9.64% | 11.85% | 16.39% | 3.50% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 13.75% | 9.56% | 16.30% | 4.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCAP and SMCF is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SCAP and SMCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCAP vs. SMCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCAP
SMCF
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Industrials
SCAP
SMCF
Financial Services
SCAP
SMCF
Consumer Cyclical
SCAP
SMCF
Real Estate
SCAP
SMCF
Basic Materials
SCAP
SMCF
Technology
SCAP
SMCF
Energy
SCAP
SMCF
Communication Services
SCAP
SMCF
Healthcare
SCAP
SMCF
Consumer Defensive
SCAP
SMCF
Utilities
SCAP
SMCF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCAP vs. SMCF — Risk / Return Rank
SCAP
SMCF
SCAP vs. SMCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCAP | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 4.63 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 12.46 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCAP | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 2.05 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.91 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SCAP vs. SMCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCAP drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, smaller than the maximum SMCF drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCAP and SMCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCAP | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.13% | -28.48% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -7.13% | -4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -2.44% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -5.29% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 2.65% | +0.82% |
Volatility
SCAP vs. SMCF - Volatility Comparison
Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) at 3.55%. This indicates that SCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCAP | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 3.55% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 10.00% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 16.18% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 20.31% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 20.31% | -1.64% |
SCAP vs. SMCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SMCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCAP vs. SMCF - Dividend Comparison
SCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than SMCF's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCAP Infracap Small Cap Income ETF | 6.97% | 6.71% | 6.89% | 0.27% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 3.44% | 3.91% | 0.61% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCAP and SMCF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCAP has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to SMCF (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCAP dropped -24.13% vs SMCF's -28.48%.
On 1-year performance, SMCF leads with 32.87% vs 27.11% for SCAP. On fees, SMCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMCF has performed better with a 32.87% return vs 27.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SCAP.
SCAP has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 3.44% for SMCF.
They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SCAP and 0.29% for SMCF.
SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCAP and SMCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer