SCA vs. TSYY
SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCA charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSYY.
Performance
SCA vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- -4.07%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -22.09%
- YTD
- -23.55%
- 1Y
- -18.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.59K | $7.11K | $8.84K | |
| $714.83K | $946.20K | $1.97M |
SCA vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | -6.10% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -9.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCA and TSYY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCA vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
SCA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSYY
SCA vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCA | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCA vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum TSYY drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCA | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -41.97% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -41.97% | +31.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -26.82% | +13.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.40% | — |
Volatility
SCA vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCA | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.79% | 30.35% | +32.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 36.66% | +26.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 36.66% | +26.13% |
SCA vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYY's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCA vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, less than TSYY's 260.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | 7.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 260.91% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCA and TSYY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCA is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCA is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 260.91%, compared with 7.36% for SCA.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SCA and 1.15% for TSYY.
Find the right allocation for SCA and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer