SCA vs. PTIR
SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). SCA is actively managed, while PTIR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SCA charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
SCA vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- 6M
- -55.33%
- YTD
- -61.62%
- 1Y
- -56.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 170.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.42M | $59.96M | $66.83M | |
| $4.59K | $7.11K | $8.84K |
SCA vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | -6.10% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -24.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCA and PTIR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCA vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
SCA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTIR
SCA vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCA | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.95 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCA vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCA | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -79.40% | +52.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -79.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -73.55% | +62.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -30.52% | +17.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 47.23% | — |
Volatility
SCA vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCA | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 30.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 80.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.79% | 103.24% | -40.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 127.74% | -64.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 127.74% | -64.95% |
SCA vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCA vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, less than PTIR's 15.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 15.14% | 5.81% |
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | 7.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCA and PTIR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SCA.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 15.14%, compared with 7.36% for SCA.
SCA is categorized as Derivative Income, while PTIR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SCA and 1.04% for PTIR.
Find the right allocation for SCA and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer