PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF (SC03.DE) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC03.DE achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than RIZF.DE's 8.57% return.


SC03.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
6.88%
6M
9.63%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
-1.90%
5Y*
-2.04%
10Y*
1.67%

RIZF.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
4.59%
6M
1.48%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
-0.29%
3Y*
-4.37%
5Y*
-8.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SC03.DE
Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF
10.13%-1.70%-9.00%-1.71%-13.43%21.05%7.32%
RIZF.DE
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD
8.57%-13.70%-1.88%-4.62%-22.47%9.35%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SC03.DE and RIZF.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC03.DE
SC03.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SC03.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

RIZF.DE
RIZF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RIZF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIZF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIZF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RIZF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIZF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF (SC03.DE) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SC03.DERIZF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.01

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.02

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

-0.04

+1.11

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC03.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the RIZF.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC03.DE and RIZF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC03.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum RIZF.DE drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC03.DE and RIZF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC03.DERIZF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.59%

-45.32%

+12.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-15.34%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.32%

-25.69%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.71%

-45.32%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.66%

-37.25%

+19.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-24.66%

+16.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.92%

7.91%

-1.99%

Volatility

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF (SC03.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) at 5.10%. This indicates that SC03.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIZF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC03.DERIZF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

5.10%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

11.33%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

15.95%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

16.84%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

16.43%

-1.65%

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC03.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RIZF.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC03.DE vs. RIZF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC03.DE nor RIZF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC03.DE and RIZF.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC03.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC03.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for RIZF.DE.

SC03.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Food & Beverage, while RIZF.DE tracks Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC03.DE and 0.45% for RIZF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC03.DE and RIZF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer