RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE
RIZF.DE (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and 2B7D.DE (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RIZF.DE tracks the Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index while 2B7D.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIZF.DE returned -8.50%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for 2B7D.DE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIZF.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7D.DE.
Performance
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIZF.DE achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7D.DE's 10.73% return.
RIZF.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- -2.41%
- 3Y*
- -4.72%
- 5Y*
- -8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
2B7D.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIZF.DE Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 6.27% | -13.70% | -1.88% | -4.62% | -22.47% | 9.35% | 6.48% |
2B7D.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 10.73% | -8.12% | 21.75% | -3.80% | 5.44% | 28.07% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIZF.DE and 2B7D.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RIZF.DE
2B7D.DE
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIZF.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.11 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 1.00 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 2.17 | -2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIZF.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.32%, which is greater than 2B7D.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIZF.DE and 2B7D.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIZF.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -27.26% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.34% | -8.78% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -15.57% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.32% | -15.57% | -29.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.58% | -5.19% | -33.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -8.28% | -16.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 4.06% | +3.86% |
Volatility
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Volatility Comparison
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) have volatilities of 4.99% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIZF.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 5.00% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 12.13% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 14.76% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 13.57% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 15.61% | +0.81% |
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIZF.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7D.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIZF.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RIZF.DE nor 2B7D.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIZF.DE and 2B7D.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B7D.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7D.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for RIZF.DE.
RIZF.DE tracks Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index, while 2B7D.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for RIZF.DE and 0.15% for 2B7D.DE.
Find the right allocation for RIZF.DE and 2B7D.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer