RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE
RIZF.DE (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RIZF.DE tracks the Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index while CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIZF.DE returned -8.50%/yr vs -1.83%/yr for CEMG.DE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIZF.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEMG.DE.
Performance
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIZF.DE achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.DE's -4.44% return.
RIZF.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- -2.41%
- 3Y*
- -4.72%
- 5Y*
- -8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- -4.44%
- 1Y
- -3.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.83%
- 10Y*
- 3.25%
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIZF.DE Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 6.27% | -13.70% | -1.88% | -4.62% | -22.47% | 9.35% | 6.48% |
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.44% | 0.88% | 16.90% | 1.71% | -16.08% | -1.08% | 8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIZF.DE and CEMG.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.49 |
The correlation between RIZF.DE and CEMG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RIZF.DE
CEMG.DE
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIZF.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.97 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | -0.23 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | -0.43 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIZF.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.32%, which is greater than CEMG.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIZF.DE and CEMG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIZF.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -33.95% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.34% | -14.72% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -20.16% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.32% | -31.09% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.58% | -16.49% | -22.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -14.98% | -9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 7.91% | +0.01% |
Volatility
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) at 3.27%. This indicates that RIZF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIZF.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 3.27% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 10.56% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 13.15% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 18.53% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 19.70% | -3.28% |
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIZF.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIZF.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RIZF.DE nor CEMG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIZF.DE and CEMG.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RIZF.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RIZF.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
RIZF.DE tracks Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index, while CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for RIZF.DE and 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
Find the right allocation for RIZF.DE and CEMG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer