SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) and XMWD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBUY.L returned 13.06%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for XMWD.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBUY.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for XMWD.L.

Performance

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SBUY.L is traded in GBp, while XMWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMWD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBUY.L achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than XMWD.L's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SBUY.L has underperformed XMWD.L with an annualized return of 13.06%, while XMWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.

SBUY.L

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 13.06%

XMWD.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.22%
• 1Y: 27.08%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 12.95%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF	6.48%	21.60%	14.64%	9.46%	-0.90%	21.36%	8.43%	25.36%	-9.32%	10.44%
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	10.38%	13.06%	20.06%	17.19%	-7.86%	23.18%	12.63%	22.87%	-3.89%	12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SBUY.L and XMWD.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014	0.76

The correlation between SBUY.L and XMWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SBUY.L	XMWD.L
Financial Services	32.9%	15.7%
Energy	17.1%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	15.8%	9.3%
Industrials	11.0%	11.4%
Technology	7.6%	28.3%
Healthcare	5.5%	8.8%
Communication Services	4.1%	9.3%
Utilities	2.2%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	5.2%
Basic Materials	1.4%	3.3%
Real Estate	0.5%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBUY.L

SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

XMWD.L

XMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
XMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBUY.L	XMWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	2.33	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	3.21	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.43	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.25	4.19	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.93	15.72	+1.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBUY.L and XMWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBUY.L	XMWD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	2.33	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.92	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.94	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.59	+0.25

Drawdowns

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -30.91%, smaller than the maximum XMWD.L drawdown of -40.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUY.L and XMWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBUY.L	XMWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.91%	-40.11%	+9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.79%	-6.43%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-18.90%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.76%	-18.90%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.91%	-26.14%	-4.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.09%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-4.51%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	1.72%	-0.23%

Volatility

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) is 2.32%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that SBUY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBUY.L	XMWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	3.45%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.04%	8.85%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.81%	11.57%	-1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	14.83%	-1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	16.04%	-0.53%

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBUY.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than XMWD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBUY.L vs. XMWD.L - Dividend Comparison

SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while XMWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF	1.69%	1.86%	1.80%	1.73%	1.91%	1.20%	1.62%	1.90%	1.31%	1.22%	1.60%	1.27%
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBUY.L and XMWD.L in my portfolio?

SBUY.L and XMWD.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBUY.L or XMWD.L?

On fees, SBUY.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBUY.L or XMWD.L?

SBUY.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XMWD.L.

What is the main difference between SBUY.L and XMWD.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SBUY.L and 0.45% for XMWD.L.