SBU vs. MUU
SBU (Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SBU is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SBU charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
SBU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBU achieves a 37.13% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 372.51% return.
SBU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 17.32%
- YTD
- 37.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -12.24%
- 1M
- -36.47%
- 6M
- 134.93%
- YTD
- 372.51%
- 1Y
- 2,805.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 419.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.51B | $1.57B | $2.27B | |
| $33.21K | $56.12K | $82.59K |
SBU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 37.13% | -6.03% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 372.51% | 24.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBU and MUU is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
SBU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MUU
SBU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 38.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 127.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBU drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBU and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -75.07% | +46.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -61.50% | +51.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -24.34% | +17.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.44% | — |
Volatility
SBU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 62.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 134.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.01% | 161.94% | -104.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.01% | 146.71% | -89.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.01% | 146.71% | -89.70% |
SBU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
SBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 1.44% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBU and MUU have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for SBU.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBU and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for SBU and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer