SBU vs. IBTF
SBU (Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. SBU is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SBU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
SBU vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SBU
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- 34.45%
- 6M
- 35.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SBU vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 34.45% | -6.03% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBU and IBTF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBU vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
SBU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTF
SBU vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBU | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 6.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 52.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 263.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBU vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBU drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBU and IBTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBU | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -10.45% | -17.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.63% | 0.00% | -11.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -3.30% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
SBU vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBU | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.26% | 0.34% | +58.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.26% | 2.37% | +56.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.26% | 2.55% | +56.71% |
SBU vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBU vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
SBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBU and IBTF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SBU.
IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for SBU.
SBU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBU and 0.07% for IBTF.
Find the right allocation for SBU and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer