SBU vs. BILS
SBU (Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF) and BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BILS is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. SBU is actively managed, while BILS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. SBU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILS.
Performance
SBU vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBU achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.40% return.
SBU
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -16.51%
- YTD
- 21.72%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SBU vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 21.72% | -0.84% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.40% | 0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBU and BILS is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBU vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
SBU
BILS
SBU vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBU | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 10.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 9.79 | -9.09 |
Drawdowns
SBU vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBU drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBU and BILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBU | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -0.41% | -27.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.00% | -0.01% | -19.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -0.04% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
SBU vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBU | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.78% | 0.23% | +59.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.78% | 0.31% | +59.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.78% | 0.30% | +59.48% |
SBU vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBU vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
SBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBU and BILS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SBU.
BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for SBU.
SBU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BILS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBU and 0.14% for BILS.
Find the right allocation for SBU and BILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer