PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBU vs. BILS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBU vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBU achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.40% return.


SBU

1D
0.85%
1M
-16.51%
YTD
21.72%
6M
11.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILS

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBU vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SBU and BILS is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBU vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBU

BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBU vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SBU vs. BILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBUBILSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

10.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

9.79

-9.09

Drawdowns

SBU vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBU drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBU and BILS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBUBILSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-0.41%

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.00%

-0.01%

-19.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-0.04%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

SBU vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBUBILSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.78%

0.23%

+59.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.78%

0.31%

+59.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.78%

0.30%

+59.48%

SBU vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBU vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

SBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%
SBU
Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBU and BILS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SBU.

BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for SBU.

SBU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BILS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SBU and 0.14% for BILS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBU and BILS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer