PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBT.TO achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than ETHH.TO's -40.68% return.


SBT.TO

1D
-2.53%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.24%
6M
24.07%
1Y
105.34%
3Y*
42.09%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
13.84%

ETHH.TO

1D
-6.35%
1M
-23.78%
YTD
-40.68%
6M
-43.85%
1Y
-34.23%
3Y*
-5.23%
5Y*
-11.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
2.24%137.07%18.55%-0.86%1.99%-12.09%
ETHH.TO
Purpose Ether ETF
-40.68%-14.37%38.87%91.16%-69.16%51.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SBT.TO and ETHH.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.12

The correlation between SBT.TO and ETHH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBT.TO
SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHH.TO
ETHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBT.TOETHH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.95

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

-0.54

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

-0.89

+6.22

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBT.TO and ETHH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBT.TOETHH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

-0.51

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

-0.16

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.12

+0.33

Drawdowns

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBT.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, smaller than the maximum ETHH.TO drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT.TO and ETHH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBT.TOETHH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.82%

-79.46%

+31.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.69%

-63.98%

+21.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.69%

-65.04%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.69%

-79.46%

+36.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.47%

-68.37%

+30.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-49.06%

+32.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.84%

38.46%

-18.62%

Volatility

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) at 11.33%. This indicates that SBT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBT.TOETHH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.19%

11.33%

+5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.92%

45.72%

+12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.01%

67.41%

-8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.64%

70.71%

-34.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.58%

73.03%

-6.45%

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBT.TO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHH.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBT.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBT.TO nor ETHH.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SBT.TO and ETHH.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBT.TO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBT.TO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ETHH.TO.

SBT.TO is categorized as Silver, while ETHH.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SBT.TO and 1.00% for ETHH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBT.TO and ETHH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer