PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHH.TO vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ETHH.TO is traded in CAD, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHH.TO achieves a -38.87% return, which is significantly lower than IBIT's -25.43% return.


ETHH.TO

1D
-2.81%
1M
6.79%
6M
-21.54%
YTD
-38.87%
1Y
-48.97%
3Y*
-3.29%
5Y*
-8.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.09%

IBIT

1D
1.54%
1M
2.27%
6M
-15.91%
YTD
-25.43%
1Y
-43.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$119.99KCA$198.31KCA$386.38K
CA$1.87BCA$1.88BCA$2.31B

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHH.TO
Purpose Ether ETF
-38.87%-14.37%30.50%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-10.68%103.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHH.TO and IBIT is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.77

The correlation between ETHH.TO and IBIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETHH.TO
ETHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETHH.TOIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.84

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.82

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

-1.22

+0.10

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is comparable to the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHH.TO and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHH.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.46%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHH.TO and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHH.TOIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.46%

-52.49%

-26.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.96%

-52.49%

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.40%

-49.07%

-18.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.64%

-18.17%

-31.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.41%

35.21%

+11.20%

Volatility

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 8.90%. This indicates that ETHH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHH.TOIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.69%

8.90%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.66%

33.53%

+12.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.55%

44.61%

+21.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.42%

49.84%

+19.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.59%

49.84%

+22.75%

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHH.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHH.TO vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHH.TO nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHH.TO and IBIT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ETHH.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Purpose and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ETHH.TO and 0.25% for IBIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHH.TO and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer