SBR vs. SCHF
SBR (Sabine Royalty Trust) is a stock, while SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Over the past 10 years, SBR returned 16.83%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for SCHF. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBR vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBR achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SBR has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 16.83%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.
SBR
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 15.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 23.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
SCHF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
SBR vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBR Sabine Royalty Trust | 7.74% | 14.04% | 4.06% | -13.10% | 132.08% | 60.71% | -24.24% | 15.77% | -9.61% | 34.83% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 13.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBR and SCHF is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.29 |
The correlation between SBR and SCHF shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBR vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
SBR
SCHF
SBR vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.31 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.52 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 9.63 | -7.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBR vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBR drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBR and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.40% | -34.87% | -21.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.54% | -11.48% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.54% | -13.41% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.56% | -29.14% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.71% | -34.87% | -15.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -3.64% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.63% | -7.36% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.86% | 3.00% | +5.86% |
Volatility
SBR vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) at 7.23%. This indicates that SBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 7.23% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 14.81% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.55% | 16.92% | +7.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.85% | 16.61% | +15.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.35% | 17.05% | +14.30% |
Dividends
SBR vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
SBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than SCHF's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBR Sabine Royalty Trust | 6.72% | 7.53% | 8.41% | 9.41% | 10.13% | 7.72% | 8.59% | 7.49% | 8.98% | 5.31% | 5.50% | 11.82% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.01% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBR and SCHF have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBR has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to SCHF (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBR dropped -56.40% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBR and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer