SBND vs. SPTS
SBND (Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF) and SPTS (SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBND is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Short Term Bond (-300%), while SPTS is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SBND returned 6.04%/yr vs 4.20%/yr for SPTS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBND charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTS.
Performance
SBND vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBND achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPTS's 0.52% return.
SBND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 5.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
SBND vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF | 0.91% | 7.50% | 4.83% | 7.20% | -7.24% | -0.68% |
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 0.52% | 5.05% | 4.20% | 4.27% | -3.86% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBND and SPTS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SBND and SPTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBND vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank
SBND
SPTS
SBND vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBND | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.53 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.96 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.43 | 15.95 | -2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBND | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.55 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.49 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
SBND vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBND drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, which is greater than SPTS's maximum drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBND and SPTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBND | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -5.83% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.71% | -0.84% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.71% | -0.96% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.21% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -1.72% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 0.21% | +0.20% |
Volatility
SBND vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) at 0.34%. This indicates that SBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBND | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 0.34% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 0.86% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 1.32% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 1.98% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 1.72% | +1.89% |
SBND vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SBND vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison
SBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than SPTS's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.65% | 4.58% | 3.90% | 2.80% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.99% | 4.25% | 3.61% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.70% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 1.20% | 0.95% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBND and SPTS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBND has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to SPTS (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBND dropped -10.78% vs SPTS's -5.83%.
On 3-year performance, SBND leads with 6.04% vs 4.20% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SBND has performed better with a 6.04% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SBND.
SBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 3.91% for SPTS.
SBND is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPTS is Government Bonds. SBND tracks Bloomberg Beta Advantage Short Term Bond (-300%), while SPTS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SBND and 0.03% for SPTS.
SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBND and SPTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer