SBND vs. REGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SBND (Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF) and REGS (Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBND is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Short Term Bond (-300%), while REGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Columbia. SBND is passively managed, while REGS is actively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SBND charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for REGS.

Performance

SBND vs. REGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SBND

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 0.46%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 1Y: 3.56%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.40%

REGS

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF	$47.01K	$105.33K	$146.94K
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF	$2.32M	$2.73M	$1.61M

SBND vs. REGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF	0.98%
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF	10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SBND and REGS is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026	0.55

Return for Risk

SBND vs. REGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBND

SBND Risk / Return Rank: 70
SBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SBND Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SBND Martin Ratio Rank: 73

REGS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBND vs. REGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBND	REGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.00	—	—

Drawdowns

SBND vs. REGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBND drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, which is greater than REGS's maximum drawdown of -8.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBND and REGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBND	REGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-8.28%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-5.37%	+4.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-2.81%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBND	REGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40%	19.96%	-17.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.57%	19.96%	-16.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.57%	19.96%	-16.39%

SBND vs. REGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than REGS's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBND vs. REGS - Dividend Comparison

SBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, while REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF	4.10%	4.65%	4.58%	3.90%	2.80%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBND and REGS in my portfolio?

SBND and REGS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBND or REGS?

On fees, SBND is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBND or REGS?

SBND is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for REGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBND or REGS?

SBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.

What is the main difference between SBND and REGS?

SBND is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while REGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SBND and 0.35% for REGS.