SBND vs. FLDB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB).

SBND and FLDB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SBND is a passively managed fund by Columbia that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Short Term Bond (-300%). It was launched on Sep 21, 2021. FLDB is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 22, 2024.

Performance

SBND vs. FLDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SBND vs. FLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF	-0.06%	7.50%	5.10%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	0.80%	4.93%	4.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBND achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than FLDB's 0.80% return.

SBND

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: 5.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDB

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBND vs. FLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDB's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SBND

Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF

FLDB

Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF

Return for Risk

SBND vs. FLDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBND

SBND Risk / Return Rank: 93
SBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SBND Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SBND Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FLDB

FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBND vs. FLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBND	FLDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	4.45	-2.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	7.69	-4.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	2.09	-0.67
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	11.28	-7.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.86	64.34	-50.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBND vs. FLDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBND Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the FLDB Sharpe Ratio of 4.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBND and FLDB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBND	FLDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	4.45	-2.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	3.62	-2.96

Correlation

The correlation between SBND and FLDB is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SBND vs. FLDB - Dividend Comparison

SBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FLDB's 4.55% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF	4.62%	4.65%	4.58%	3.90%	2.80%	0.43%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	4.55%	4.72%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SBND vs. FLDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBND drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, which is greater than FLDB's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBND and FLDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBND	FLDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-0.49%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.71%	-0.40%	-1.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	0.00%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-0.05%	-2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	0.07%	+0.35%

Volatility

SBND vs. FLDB - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) at 0.28%. This indicates that SBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBND	FLDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	0.28%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.67%	0.68%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83%	1.07%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.66%	1.33%	+2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.66%	1.33%	+2.33%