SBLK vs. FTGC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SBLK (Star Bulk Carriers Corp.) is a stock, while FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Over the past 10 years, SBLK returned 32.55%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for FTGC. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SBLK vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 45.28% return, which is significantly higher than FTGC's 18.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SBLK has outperformed FTGC with an annualized return of 32.55%, while FTGC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.15% annualized return.

SBLK

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 4.11%
• YTD: 45.28%
• 6M: 47.82%
• 1Y: 70.08%
• 3Y*: 22.24%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 32.55%

FTGC

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -7.37%
• YTD: 18.86%
• 6M: 17.54%
• 1Y: 28.18%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBLK vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp.	45.28%	30.76%	-21.04%	19.24%	8.50%	185.15%	-24.77%	29.82%	-18.83%	120.35%
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	18.86%	14.61%	9.96%	-5.36%	17.36%	27.95%	2.17%	6.40%	-12.75%	2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SBLK and FTGC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.25

The correlation between SBLK and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SBLK vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBLK

SBLK Risk / Return Rank: 89
SBLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SBLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SBLK Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SBLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SBLK Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FTGC

FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 55
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBLK vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBLK	FTGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	1.82	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.46	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	2.60	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	9.67	+1.48

SBLK vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBLK and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBLK vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than FTGC's maximum drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and FTGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBLK	FTGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.76%	-59.47%	-40.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.49%	-10.87%	-6.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.44%	-10.87%	-37.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.44%	-22.64%	-25.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.77%	-35.91%	-37.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.44%	-10.87%	-82.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.70%	-27.34%	-55.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.30%	2.94%	+3.36%

Volatility

SBLK vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 3.07%. This indicates that SBLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBLK	FTGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.39%	3.07%	+6.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.94%	13.21%	+9.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.65%	15.70%	+13.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.86%	15.87%	+26.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.44%	14.71%	+37.73%

Dividends

SBLK vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than FTGC's 16.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	16.13%	17.74%	3.05%	3.34%	10.35%	7.21%	0.00%	0.81%	0.80%	1.21%
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp.	3.82%	1.56%	16.72%	7.38%	33.80%	9.93%	0.57%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBLK and FTGC in my portfolio?

SBLK and FTGC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBLK or FTGC?

SBLK has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FTGC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBLK dropped -99.76% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.