SBIT vs. BETH
SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) and BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. SBIT is passively managed, while BETH is actively managed. Over the past year, SBIT returned 68.00% vs -40.13% for BETH. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SBIT vs. BETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 37.02% return, which is significantly higher than BETH's -28.99% return.
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETH
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -19.49%
- YTD
- -28.99%
- 6M
- -33.42%
- 1Y
- -40.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT vs. BETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | -25.11% | -73.13% |
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF | -28.99% | -11.20% | 24.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIT and BETH is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.99 |
The correlation between SBIT and BETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIT vs. BETH — Risk / Return Rank
SBIT
BETH
SBIT vs. BETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBIT | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.87 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | -0.77 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | -1.31 | +4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIT | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | -0.86 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.41 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
SBIT vs. BETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than BETH's maximum drawdown of -52.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and BETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIT | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.35% | -52.55% | -38.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.94% | -52.55% | +4.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.26% | -52.01% | -26.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.55% | -17.60% | -50.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | 30.70% | -6.01% |
Volatility
SBIT vs. BETH - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) at 9.53%. This indicates that SBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIT | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.22% | 9.53% | +8.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.46% | 36.39% | +32.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.18% | 46.81% | +40.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.47% | 51.18% | +46.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.47% | 51.18% | +46.29% |
SBIT vs. BETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SBIT and BETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SBIT vs. BETH - Dividend Comparison
SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than BETH's 57.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF | 57.55% | 57.68% | 19.71% | 0.36% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBIT and BETH have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to BETH (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIT dropped -91.35% vs BETH's -52.55%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 68.00% vs -40.13% for BETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 68.00% return vs -40.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBIT and BETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BETH has the higher dividend yield at 57.55%, compared with 3.42% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBIT and BETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer