PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIT vs. BETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBIT vs. BETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 37.02% return, which is significantly higher than BETH's -28.99% return.


SBIT

1D
5.42%
1M
46.58%
YTD
37.02%
6M
52.37%
1Y
68.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BETH

1D
-3.09%
1M
-19.49%
YTD
-28.99%
6M
-33.42%
1Y
-40.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIT vs. BETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
37.02%-25.11%-73.13%
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-28.99%-11.20%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIT and BETH is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

-0.99

The correlation between SBIT and BETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBIT vs. BETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIT vs. BETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBITBETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.87

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.77

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

-1.31

+4.07

SBIT vs. BETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the BETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIT and BETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBITBETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

-0.86

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.41

-0.88

Drawdowns

SBIT vs. BETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than BETH's maximum drawdown of -52.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and BETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBITBETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.35%

-52.55%

-38.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.94%

-52.55%

+4.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.26%

-52.01%

-26.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.55%

-17.60%

-50.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.69%

30.70%

-6.01%

Volatility

SBIT vs. BETH - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) at 9.53%. This indicates that SBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBITBETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.22%

9.53%

+8.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.46%

36.39%

+32.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.18%

46.81%

+40.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.47%

51.18%

+46.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.47%

51.18%

+46.29%

SBIT vs. BETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SBIT and BETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SBIT vs. BETH - Dividend Comparison

SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than BETH's 57.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
57.55%57.68%19.71%0.36%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.42%0.52%1.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBIT and BETH have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to BETH (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIT dropped -91.35% vs BETH's -52.55%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 68.00% vs -40.13% for BETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 68.00% return vs -40.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIT and BETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BETH has the higher dividend yield at 57.55%, compared with 3.42% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBIT and BETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer