PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIT vs. BETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBIT vs. BETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 45.97% return, which is significantly higher than BETH's -32.64% return.


SBIT

1D
6.59%
1M
41.04%
YTD
45.97%
6M
46.69%
1Y
71.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BETH

1D
-3.37%
1M
-18.22%
YTD
-32.64%
6M
-32.87%
1Y
-40.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIT vs. BETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
45.97%-25.11%-73.74%
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-32.64%-11.20%17.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIT and BETH is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.98

The correlation between SBIT and BETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBIT vs. BETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIT vs. BETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBITBETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.87

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

-0.73

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

-1.24

+4.34

SBIT vs. BETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the BETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIT and BETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBIT vs. BETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than BETH's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and BETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBITBETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.35%

-56.03%

-35.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.94%

-56.03%

+8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.84%

-54.48%

-22.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.66%

-18.31%

-50.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.93%

33.01%

-9.08%

Volatility

SBIT vs. BETH - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a higher volatility of 26.11% compared to ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) at 13.75%. This indicates that SBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBITBETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.11%

13.75%

+12.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.77%

36.61%

+32.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.37%

47.49%

+40.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.39%

51.18%

+46.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.39%

51.18%

+46.21%

SBIT vs. BETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SBIT and BETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SBIT vs. BETH - Dividend Comparison

SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than BETH's 60.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
60.67%57.68%19.71%0.36%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.21%0.52%1.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBIT and BETH have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (26.11%) compared to BETH (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIT dropped -91.35% vs BETH's -56.03%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 71.04% vs -40.77% for BETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETH has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 71.04% return vs -40.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIT and BETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BETH has the higher dividend yield at 60.67%, compared with 3.21% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBIT and BETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer