SBIT vs. BETE
SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) and BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. Over the past year, SBIT returned 68.00% vs -35.67% for BETE. At a correlation of -0.93, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SBIT vs. BETE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 37.02% return, which is significantly higher than BETE's -34.13% return.
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETE
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -21.37%
- YTD
- -34.13%
- 6M
- -38.03%
- 1Y
- -35.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | -25.11% | -73.13% |
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | -34.13% | -8.17% | 14.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIT and BETE is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.93 |
The correlation between SBIT and BETE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIT vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank
SBIT
BETE
SBIT vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBIT | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | -0.63 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | -1.07 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIT | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | -0.65 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.24 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
SBIT vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than BETE's maximum drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and BETE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIT | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.35% | -56.81% | -34.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.94% | -56.81% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.26% | -56.81% | -21.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.55% | -21.36% | -47.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | 33.46% | -8.77% |
Volatility
SBIT vs. BETE - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) at 9.55%. This indicates that SBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIT | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.22% | 9.55% | +8.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.46% | 40.03% | +28.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.18% | 54.95% | +32.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.47% | 56.48% | +40.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.47% | 56.48% | +40.99% |
SBIT vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SBIT and BETE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SBIT vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison
SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than BETE's 83.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | 83.91% | 68.22% | 15.22% | 0.78% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBIT and BETE have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to BETE (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIT dropped -91.35% vs BETE's -56.81%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 68.00% vs -35.67% for BETE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 9.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 68.00% return vs -35.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBIT and BETE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BETE has the higher dividend yield at 83.91%, compared with 3.42% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBIT and BETE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer