SBHVX vs. TNVIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX).
SBHVX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. TNVIX is managed by 1290 Funds. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014.
Performance
SBHVX vs. TNVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBHVX vs. TNVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 6.34% | 12.27% | 12.31% | 11.97% | -14.66% | 16.61% | 6.22% | 24.65% | -4.54% | 10.92% |
TNVIX 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 7.87% | 13.91% | 11.48% | 21.31% | -11.37% | 21.85% | 11.33% | 19.81% | -14.34% | 19.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBHVX achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than TNVIX's 7.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SBHVX has underperformed TNVIX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while TNVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.
SBHVX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- 6.34%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
TNVIX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 27.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBHVX vs. TNVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TNVIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBHVX vs. TNVIX — Risk / Return Rank
SBHVX
TNVIX
SBHVX vs. TNVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBHVX | TNVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 2.06 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.23 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.62 | 8.35 | -1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBHVX | TNVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.45 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.51 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBHVX and TNVIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBHVX vs. TNVIX - Dividend Comparison
SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than TNVIX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 10.95% | 11.65% | 4.61% | 1.37% | 1.25% | 4.66% | 0.95% | 6.05% | 10.28% | 6.78% | 0.22% | 5.76% |
TNVIX 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 3.66% | 3.95% | 8.76% | 3.82% | 2.51% | 7.05% | 0.47% | 1.74% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.79% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SBHVX vs. TNVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, roughly equal to the maximum TNVIX drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and TNVIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBHVX | TNVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -42.75% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -10.14% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -25.61% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -42.75% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -6.28% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -6.27% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 3.56% | +1.05% |
Volatility
SBHVX vs. TNVIX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) at 6.74%. This indicates that SBHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBHVX | TNVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 6.74% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 11.91% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 20.75% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 19.77% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.08% | +0.18% |