SBHVX vs. SSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX).
SBHVX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000.
Performance
SBHVX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBHVX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 5.47% | 12.27% | 12.31% | 11.97% | -14.66% | 16.61% | 6.22% | 24.65% | -4.54% | 10.92% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 2.41% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBHVX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SBHVX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 9.58%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.
SBHVX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
SSLCX
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBHVX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBHVX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
SBHVX
SSLCX
SBHVX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBHVX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.62 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 0.97 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.89 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 2.88 | +3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBHVX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.62 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.32 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.48 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.37 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBHVX and SSLCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBHVX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than SSLCX's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 11.04% | 11.65% | 4.61% | 1.37% | 1.25% | 4.66% | 0.95% | 6.05% | 10.28% | 6.78% | 0.22% | 5.76% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
SBHVX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and SSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBHVX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -63.14% | +21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -10.06% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -22.57% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -48.07% | +6.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -3.65% | -5.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -11.38% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 3.09% | +1.49% |
Volatility
SBHVX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 5.03%. This indicates that SBHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBHVX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 5.03% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 11.18% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 17.61% | +8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 17.65% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.07% | +0.19% |