PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBHVX vs. PRSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBHVX achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly higher than PRSVX's 17.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SBHVX having a 10.55% annualized return and PRSVX not far ahead at 10.63%.


SBHVX

1D
1.46%
1M
4.81%
YTD
20.69%
6M
20.39%
1Y
44.43%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.55%

PRSVX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.66%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBHVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund
20.69%12.27%12.31%11.97%-14.66%16.61%6.22%24.65%-4.54%10.92%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
17.21%8.31%10.84%12.34%-18.53%25.47%12.49%25.82%-11.58%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SBHVX and PRSVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.94

The correlation between SBHVX and PRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBHVX vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBHVX
SBHVX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SBHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SBHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSVX
PRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBHVXPRSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.98

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

14.83

-1.56

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBHVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the PRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBHVX and PRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBHVXPRSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.13

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.33

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.64

-0.19

Drawdowns

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum PRSVX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and PRSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBHVXPRSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.54%

-55.37%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-8.93%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.43%

-24.60%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.43%

-28.17%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

-40.97%

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-7.49%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

2.37%

+1.21%

Volatility

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) at 4.49%. This indicates that SBHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBHVXPRSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

4.49%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

12.31%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.15%

16.70%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

19.79%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

21.03%

+0.26%

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBHVX vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison

SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, less than PRSVX's 10.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
10.09%11.83%9.77%3.27%5.28%6.98%2.03%4.59%9.46%3.79%3.77%22.55%
SBHVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund
9.65%11.65%4.61%1.37%1.25%4.66%0.95%6.05%10.28%6.78%0.22%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SBHVX and PRSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SBHVX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to PRSVX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBHVX dropped -41.54% vs PRSVX's -55.37%.

SBHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBHVX and PRSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer