PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFCX vs. CHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBFCX vs. CHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFCX achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than CHY's 18.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFCX has underperformed CHY with an annualized return of 7.22%, while CHY has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.


SBFCX

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.95%
6M
3.13%
YTD
3.98%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
6.69%

CHY

1D
1.59%
1M
-4.44%
6M
14.47%
YTD
18.32%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.89M$2.53M$2.63M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SBFCX vs. CHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
3.98%5.07%9.48%7.98%-11.63%10.90%11.35%19.84%-0.44%18.47%
CHY
Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund
18.32%3.97%17.24%20.78%-28.05%22.17%36.75%32.63%-12.60%24.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFCX and CHY is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2003

0.49

The correlation between SBFCX and CHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFCX vs. CHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBFCX
SBFCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SBFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CHY
CHY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBFCX vs. CHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) and Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFCXCHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.67

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.28

11.07

-6.79

SBFCX vs. CHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFCX and CHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFCX vs. CHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFCX drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, smaller than the maximum CHY drawdown of -60.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFCX and CHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFCXCHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.88%

-60.53%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-11.42%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.68%

-24.32%

+15.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.06%

-35.99%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.79%

-50.41%

+26.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-6.59%

+4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-9.06%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.75%

-1.50%

Volatility

SBFCX vs. CHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A (SBFCX) is 1.53%, while Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that SBFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFCXCHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

5.89%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

14.97%

-9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

17.49%

-11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.22%

19.52%

-11.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.52%

23.33%

-13.81%

SBFCX vs. CHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBFCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CHY's 2.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBFCX vs. CHY - Dividend Comparison

SBFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than CHY's 9.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHY
Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund
9.41%10.61%9.88%10.46%11.37%7.42%7.14%8.72%12.13%10.13%11.37%11.42%
SBFCX
Victory INCORE Investment Grade Convertible Fund Class A
3.12%4.35%1.87%2.84%2.19%9.86%4.88%4.94%5.66%3.13%1.38%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFCX and CHY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHY has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to SBFCX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFCX dropped -47.88% vs CHY's -60.53%.

CHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFCX and CHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer