PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBCPX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund (SBCPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBCPX achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SBCPX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 4.84%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.


SBCPX

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.59%
6M
2.67%
YTD
3.95%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
4.84%
ALL TIME*
5.03%

TSAIX

1D
2.37%
1M
-0.37%
6M
5.88%
YTD
8.84%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
11.59%
ALL TIME*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBCPX
Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund
3.95%10.80%7.76%10.29%-13.81%5.87%8.80%13.64%-3.87%8.02%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
8.84%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SBCPX and TSAIX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2011

0.86

The correlation between SBCPX and TSAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (10 years) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBCPX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBCPX
SBCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SBCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund (SBCPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBCPXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.81

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.29

7.59

+0.71

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBCPX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBCPX drawdown since its inception was -32.37%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBCPX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBCPXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.37%

-34.58%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-10.28%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.42%

-17.29%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.66%

-28.28%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.66%

-34.58%

+13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.63%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-4.88%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.44%

-1.33%

Volatility

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund (SBCPX) is 1.87%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that SBCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBCPXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

4.30%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.35%

11.82%

-6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.40%

14.29%

-7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.77%

16.43%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.05%

17.61%

-10.56%

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBCPX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBCPX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

SBCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than TSAIX's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBCPX
Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund
8.26%5.17%3.25%2.36%6.06%5.14%3.25%4.08%4.18%7.15%3.37%2.28%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.78%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SBCPX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSAIX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to SBCPX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBCPX dropped -32.37% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

SBCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBCPX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer