PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBCPX vs. NWQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund (SBCPX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SBCPX having a 5.12% return and NWQIX slightly higher at 5.19%. Over the past 10 years, SBCPX has underperformed NWQIX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while NWQIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.68% annualized return.


SBCPX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.74%
YTD
5.12%
6M
5.40%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
5.22%

NWQIX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.57%
YTD
5.19%
6M
6.53%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
5.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBCPX
Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund
5.12%10.80%7.76%10.29%-13.81%5.87%8.80%13.64%-3.87%8.02%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.19%12.22%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SBCPX and NWQIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.74

The correlation between SBCPX and NWQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBCPX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBCPX
SBCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SBCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SBCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund (SBCPX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBCPXNWQIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

4.06

-1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

6.50

-3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.93

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

5.31

-2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.78

25.30

-12.53

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the NWQIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBCPX and NWQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBCPXNWQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

4.06

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.80

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.90

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.77

+0.03

Drawdowns

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBCPX drawdown since its inception was -32.37%, which is greater than NWQIX's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBCPX and NWQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBCPXNWQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.37%

-23.89%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-2.94%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.24%

-4.59%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.66%

-17.75%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.66%

-23.89%

+3.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.01%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.61%

+0.45%

Volatility

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund (SBCPX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 1.22%. This indicates that SBCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBCPXNWQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

1.22%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.73%

3.06%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

3.85%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.67%

5.68%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

6.33%

+0.70%

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBCPX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBCPX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison

SBCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than NWQIX's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.93%6.52%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%
SBCPX
Franklin Multi-Asset Defensive Growth Fund
4.96%5.17%3.25%2.36%6.06%5.14%3.25%4.08%4.18%7.15%3.37%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBCPX and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBCPX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to NWQIX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBCPX dropped -32.37% vs NWQIX's -23.89%.

NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBCPX and NWQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer