SBB vs. TSLS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

SBB (ProShares Short SmallCap600) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - SBB tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%) while TSLS tracks the Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SBB returned -10.24%/yr vs -29.44%/yr for TSLS. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SBB vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBB achieves a -18.99% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 26.49% return.

SBB

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: -13.87%
• YTD: -18.99%
• 1Y: -25.10%
• 3Y*: -10.24%
• 5Y*: -6.51%
• 10Y*: -11.90%
• ALL TIME*: -12.49%

TSLS

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: 16.39%
• 6M: 19.20%
• YTD: 26.49%
• 1Y: -17.47%
• 3Y*: -29.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600	$22.82K	$20.79K	$47.74K
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF	$28.02M	$26.25M	$30.64M

SBB vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600	-18.99%	-3.56%	-3.73%	-10.44%	5.97%
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF	26.49%	-34.95%	-55.71%	-60.12%	105.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SBB and TSLS is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.45

Return for Risk

SBB vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBB

SBB Risk / Return Rank: 0
SBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SBB Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SBB Martin Ratio Rank: 0

TSLS

TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 6
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBB vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBB	TSLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.43	-0.38	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.98	-0.26	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.97	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	-0.44	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.85	-0.62	-1.23

SBB vs. TSLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBB Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the TSLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBB and TSLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBB vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBB drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than TSLS's maximum drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBB and TSLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBB	TSLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.03%	-90.73%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.84%	-40.10%	+15.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.36%	-84.16%	+44.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.03%	-87.25%	-8.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.70%	-64.48%	-10.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.87%	28.16%	-14.29%

Volatility

SBB vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) is 4.17%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a volatility of 16.85%. This indicates that SBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBB	TSLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	16.85%	-12.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	34.00%	-21.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.68%	46.80%	-29.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.55%	58.95%	-37.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.25%	58.95%	-35.70%

SBB vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SBB and TSLS have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SBB vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison

SBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than TSLS's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600	3.84%	3.44%	4.86%	4.64%	0.31%	0.00%	0.04%	1.20%	0.17%
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF	2.48%	4.30%	7.62%	4.52%	3.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBB and TSLS in my portfolio?

SBB and TSLS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBB or TSLS?

TSLS has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to SBB (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBB dropped -96.03% vs TSLS's -90.73%.

Which ETF is better, SBB or TSLS?

On 3-year performance, SBB leads with -10.24% vs -29.44% for TSLS. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SBB has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SBB or TSLS?

Over the 3-year period, SBB has performed better with a -10.24% return vs -29.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBB or TSLS?

SBB and TSLS have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBB or TSLS?

SBB has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 2.48% for TSLS.

What is the main difference between SBB and TSLS?

SBB tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%), while TSLS tracks Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.