SBB vs. TSLS
SBB (ProShares Short SmallCap600) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - SBB tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%) while TSLS tracks the Tesla Inc (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SBB returned -10.56%/yr vs -37.73%/yr for TSLS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBB charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLS.
Performance
SBB vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBB achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 4.36% return.
SBB
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 6M
- -12.19%
- 1Y
- -22.27%
- 3Y*
- -10.56%
- 5Y*
- -4.83%
- 10Y*
- -11.72%
TSLS
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -7.80%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- -30.44%
- 3Y*
- -37.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBB vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | -13.39% | -3.56% | -3.73% | -10.44% | 4.42% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 4.36% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 100.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBB and TSLS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBB vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank
SBB
TSLS
SBB vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBB | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.91 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.66 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | -0.93 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBB | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.25 | -0.66 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | -0.53 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SBB vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBB drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, which is greater than TSLS's maximum drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBB and TSLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBB | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.75% | -90.73% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.68% | -46.42% | +23.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.17% | -84.16% | +48.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.75% | -89.48% | -6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.54% | -63.52% | -11.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 32.94% | -19.75% |
Volatility
SBB vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) is 4.55%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that SBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBB | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 12.11% | -7.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 27.74% | -15.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 46.69% | -28.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 58.73% | -37.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 58.73% | -35.47% |
SBB vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLS's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBB vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison
SBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than TSLS's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | 3.63% | 3.44% | 4.86% | 4.64% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.20% | 0.17% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.35% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBB and TSLS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to SBB (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBB dropped -95.75% vs TSLS's -90.73%.
On 3-year performance, SBB leads with -10.56% vs -37.73% for TSLS. On fees, SBB is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SBB has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SBB has performed better with a -10.56% return vs -37.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBB is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
SBB has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 3.35% for TSLS.
SBB tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%), while TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SBB and 1.07% for TSLS.
TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBB and TSLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer