SBB vs. EFZ
SBB (ProShares Short SmallCap600) and EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - SBB tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%) while EFZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBB returned -12.11%/yr vs -8.83%/yr for EFZ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SBB vs. EFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBB achieves a -15.25% return, which is significantly lower than EFZ's -6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SBB has underperformed EFZ with an annualized return of -12.11%, while EFZ has yielded a comparatively higher -8.83% annualized return.
SBB
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- -15.25%
- 6M
- -13.02%
- 1Y
- -23.27%
- 3Y*
- -11.07%
- 5Y*
- -5.14%
- 10Y*
- -12.11%
EFZ
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- -6.98%
- 6M
- -6.74%
- 1Y
- -15.21%
- 3Y*
- -10.01%
- 5Y*
- -5.55%
- 10Y*
- -8.83%
SBB vs. EFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | -15.25% | -3.56% | -3.73% | -10.44% | 13.75% | -25.40% | -26.53% | -18.64% | 8.40% | -12.70% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -6.98% | -20.92% | 2.90% | -10.38% | 13.15% | -12.75% | -16.02% | -16.56% | 16.26% | -20.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBB and EFZ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2007 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SBB and EFZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBB vs. EFZ — Risk / Return Rank
SBB
EFZ
SBB vs. EFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBB | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.86 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.89 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.80 | -1.51 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBB vs. EFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBB drawdown since its inception was -95.86%, which is greater than EFZ's maximum drawdown of -88.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBB and EFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBB | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.86% | -88.08% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -17.09% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.82% | -35.42% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.82% | -43.77% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.52% | -61.88% | -11.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.85% | -87.82% | -8.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.58% | -67.13% | -7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 10.10% | +2.96% |
Volatility
SBB vs. EFZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short SmallCap600 (SBB) is 4.93%, while ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that SBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBB | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.39% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 14.12% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 16.82% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 16.84% | +4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 17.16% | +6.12% |
SBB vs. EFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SBB and EFZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SBB vs. EFZ - Dividend Comparison
SBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than EFZ's 4.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 4.04% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% |
SBB ProShares Short SmallCap600 | 3.71% | 3.44% | 4.86% | 4.64% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.20% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBB and EFZ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFZ has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to SBB (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBB dropped -95.86% vs EFZ's -88.08%.
On 10-year performance, EFZ leads with -8.83% vs -12.11% for SBB. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SBB has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -8.83% return vs -12.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBB and EFZ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EFZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 3.71% for SBB.
SBB tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (-100%), while EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%).
EFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.91 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBB and EFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer