PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBASX vs. CTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBASX achieves a 20.74% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 37.63% return.


SBASX

1D
0.27%
1M
7.90%
YTD
20.74%
6M
18.27%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*

CTSIX

1D
0.66%
1M
6.42%
YTD
37.63%
6M
34.34%
1Y
67.96%
3Y*
35.10%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
20.74%3.95%11.89%13.96%-13.13%23.52%22.80%0.00%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
37.63%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%63.38%0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SBASX and CTSIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.82

The correlation between SBASX and CTSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBASX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBASX
SBASX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SBASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBASX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SBASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBASX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBASXCTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

5.75

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

22.69

-12.20

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBASX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBASX drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBASX and CTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBASXCTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-50.83%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-12.38%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.56%

-28.40%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-50.60%

+24.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-20.49%

+12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.13%

+0.01%

Volatility

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) is 5.50%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that SBASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBASXCTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

11.67%

-6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

23.15%

-9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

29.38%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

28.33%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

29.92%

-7.71%

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBASX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

SBASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
4.62%5.58%5.48%3.65%2.10%18.57%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBASX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTSIX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to SBASX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBASX dropped -34.34% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBASX and CTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer