PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBASX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBASX achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 20.14% return.


SBASX

1D
-1.33%
1M
6.47%
YTD
19.13%
6M
16.51%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*

WMKSX

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.65%
YTD
20.14%
6M
17.56%
1Y
33.60%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
14.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
19.13%3.95%11.89%13.96%-13.13%23.52%22.80%0.00%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
20.14%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SBASX and WMKSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.94

The correlation between SBASX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBASX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBASX
SBASX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SBASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBASX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SBASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBASX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBASXWMKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.14

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

13.86

-4.49

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBASX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBASX drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBASX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBASXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-64.09%

+29.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-8.50%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.56%

-24.20%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-39.84%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.62%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-15.65%

+7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.53%

+0.61%

Volatility

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.61%. This indicates that SBASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBASXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

4.61%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

12.32%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

17.91%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

26.13%

-6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

23.96%

-1.75%

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBASX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

SBASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than WMKSX's 19.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
4.69%5.58%5.48%3.65%2.10%18.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
19.07%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SBASX and WMKSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SBASX has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to WMKSX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBASX dropped -34.34% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBASX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer