SBAC vs. RIO
SBAC (SBA Communications Corporation) and RIO (Rio Tinto Group) are both stocks. SBAC operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while RIO operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, SBAC returned 5.84%/yr vs 18.86%/yr for RIO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBAC vs. RIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBAC achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 14.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SBAC has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 5.84%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.86% annualized return.
SBAC
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 1Y
- -20.37%
- 3Y*
- -5.20%
- 5Y*
- -9.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.09%
RIO
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -11.00%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 54.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.71%
SBAC vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | -4.71% | -3.13% | -18.18% | -8.15% | -27.30% | 38.95% | 17.81% | 49.30% | -0.90% | 58.20% |
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 14.41% | 44.47% | -15.36% | 11.06% | 18.48% | -3.67% | 36.22% | 33.18% | -2.93% | 44.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBAC and RIO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 1999 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SBAC and RIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SBAC:
$19.30B
RIO:
$144.65B
SBAC:
$9.52
RIO:
$13.11
SBAC:
19.11
RIO:
6.79
SBAC:
6.81
RIO:
1.31
SBAC:
$2.85B
RIO:
$111.41B
SBAC:
$1.28B
RIO:
$31.10B
SBAC:
$1.74B
RIO:
$40.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBAC vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank
SBAC
RIO
SBAC vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBAC | RIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.31 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.66 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 8.59 | -9.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBAC vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBAC drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, which is greater than RIO's maximum drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBAC and RIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBAC | RIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.65% | -88.97% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.80% | -20.74% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.21% | -24.19% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.50% | -35.25% | -19.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.50% | -37.47% | -17.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.57% | -20.50% | -29.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -23.74% | -11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.18% | 6.41% | +10.77% |
Volatility
SBAC vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison
SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO) have volatilities of 8.56% and 8.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBAC | RIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 8.38% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | 24.96% | +3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.51% | 29.72% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 29.33% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.15% | 30.42% | -2.27% |
Dividends
SBAC vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison
SBAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than RIO's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 4.51% | 4.66% | 7.40% | 5.40% | 10.48% | 10.23% | 5.13% | 7.68% | 6.32% | 4.47% | 3.93% | 7.58% |
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 2.59% | 2.30% | 1.92% | 1.34% | 1.01% | 0.60% | 0.66% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SBAC vs. RIO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SBA Communications Corporation and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBAC vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison
SBAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SBA Communications Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 703.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
SBAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SBA Communications Corporation reported an operating income of 342.85M and revenue of 703.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.7%.
RIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
SBAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SBA Communications Corporation reported a net income of 184.83M and revenue of 703.44M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.
RIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBAC and RIO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBAC has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to RIO (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBAC dropped -99.65% vs RIO's -88.97%.
RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBAC and RIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer