PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAWMX vs. TIBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWMX achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 17.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SAWMX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


SAWMX

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.50%
YTD
10.12%
6M
11.78%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
8.70%

TIBAX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.00%
YTD
17.18%
6M
20.85%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
26.26%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAWMX
SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund
10.12%18.15%6.40%13.60%-8.96%16.67%4.12%17.03%-7.87%13.89%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
17.18%36.62%13.23%18.01%-7.95%20.08%-0.67%17.72%-4.54%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SAWMX and TIBAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.84

The correlation between SAWMX and TIBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAWMX vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAWMX
SAWMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SAWMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBAX
TIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAWMXTIBAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.68

4.75

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.40

6.81

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.96

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

7.37

-2.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.83

28.83

-7.00

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is comparable to the TIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWMX and TIBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAWMXTIBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68

4.75

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.45

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.92

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.79

+0.01

Drawdowns

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWMX drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, smaller than the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWMX and TIBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAWMXTIBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.56%

-49.12%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.79%

-5.43%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-9.20%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

-20.94%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.56%

-34.85%

+4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-5.99%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.39%

0.00%

Volatility

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX) is 2.00%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that SAWMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAWMXTIBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

3.08%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.52%

6.95%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.31%

8.42%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.90%

11.12%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.10%

13.46%

-2.36%

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAWMX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison

SAWMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than TIBAX's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAWMX
SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund
5.40%5.95%3.34%4.20%8.36%4.52%4.88%5.66%6.82%1.28%1.96%0.00%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
4.88%5.64%5.44%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAWMX and TIBAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBAX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to SAWMX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAWMX dropped -30.56% vs TIBAX's -49.12%.

TIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.75 vs 3.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAWMX and TIBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer