SAUMX vs. CSMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about SA U.S. Small Company Fund (SAUMX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX).
SAUMX is managed by SA Funds. It was launched on Aug 5, 1999. CSMDX is managed by Copeland Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017.
Performance
SAUMX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SAUMX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUMX SA U.S. Small Company Fund | 0.50% | 8.87% | 11.14% | 17.30% | -14.25% | 26.93% | 11.61% | 22.17% | -12.82% | 8.81% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 1.51% | 2.72% | 2.24% | 18.89% | -14.89% | 22.60% | 8.29% | 29.90% | -5.20% | 10.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUMX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than CSMDX's 1.51% return.
SAUMX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 17.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
CSMDX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 9.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAUMX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SAUMX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
SAUMX
CSMDX
SAUMX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA U.S. Small Company Fund (SAUMX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAUMX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.51 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 0.89 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 0.58 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 2.19 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAUMX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.51 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.21 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.40 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUMX and CSMDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SAUMX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison
SAUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than CSMDX's 3.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUMX SA U.S. Small Company Fund | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.29% | 3.64% | 3.19% | 25.26% | 1.99% | 4.48% | 3.22% | 7.96% | 5.16% | 8.49% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.09% | 3.14% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 4.07% | 6.67% | 0.38% | 2.61% | 4.40% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SAUMX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUMX drawdown since its inception was -43.14%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUMX and CSMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUMX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -37.28% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -13.33% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.80% | -24.60% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.94% | -9.20% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -5.84% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.87% | 3.52% | +2.35% |
Volatility
SAUMX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison
SA U.S. Small Company Fund (SAUMX) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 4.58%. This indicates that SAUMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAUMX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 4.58% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 10.22% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 19.31% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 18.12% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 19.25% | +2.70% |