SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L
SAUM.L (iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and XMAW.L (Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SAUM.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XMAW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAUM.L returned 10.39%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for XMAW.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAUM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XMAW.L.
Performance
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SAUM.L is traded in GBP, while XMAW.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMAW.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than XMAW.L's 11.58% return.
SAUM.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XMAW.L
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 30.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 7.86% | 28.60% | 4.78% | 17.25% | -7.39% | 14.31% | 6.03% | 18.94% | -3.56% |
XMAW.L Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 11.58% | 13.86% | 20.55% | 16.87% | -10.40% | 20.70% | 12.24% | 21.60% | -3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUM.L and XMAW.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SAUM.L and XMAW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Technology
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Industrials
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Consumer Cyclical
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Utilities
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Healthcare
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Consumer Defensive
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Communication Services
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Energy
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Basic Materials
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Real Estate
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAUM.L
XMAW.L
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAUM.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.52 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 4.12 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 16.61 | -10.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAUM.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.74 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.92 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.86 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than XMAW.L's maximum drawdown of -25.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and XMAW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUM.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -25.05% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -7.37% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -18.92% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | -18.92% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.49% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -3.83% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.83% | +1.29% |
Volatility
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L) at 3.05%. This indicates that SAUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAUM.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.05% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 8.23% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 11.09% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 13.40% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 14.60% | +4.41% |
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMAW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SAUM.L vs. XMAW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAUM.L nor XMAW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAUM.L and XMAW.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAUM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAUM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XMAW.L.
SAUM.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XMAW.L is Global Equities. SAUM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XMAW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAUM.L and 0.25% for XMAW.L.
Find the right allocation for SAUM.L and XMAW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer