PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAUM.L is traded in GBP, while SX5S.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SX5S.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than SX5S.L's 6.46% return.


SAUM.L

1D
0.58%
1M
5.64%
YTD
7.86%
6M
9.55%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*

SX5S.L

1D
0.35%
1M
4.85%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.51%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAUM.L
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.86%28.60%4.78%17.25%-7.39%14.31%6.03%18.94%-3.56%
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.46%27.68%6.13%19.91%-3.67%14.48%2.12%23.51%-4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SAUM.L and SX5S.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.88

The correlation between SAUM.L and SX5S.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAUM.L
SX5S.L

Financial Services

26.6%
25.1%

Technology

17.7%
16.1%

Industrials

17.1%
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
9.8%

Utilities

6.5%
4.8%

Healthcare

5.6%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.5%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.3%

Energy

3.9%
5.2%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Financial Services

SAUM.L
26.6%
SX5S.L
25.1%

Technology

SAUM.L
17.7%
SX5S.L
16.1%

Industrials

SAUM.L
17.1%
SX5S.L
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SAUM.L
8.3%
SX5S.L
9.8%

Utilities

SAUM.L
6.5%
SX5S.L
4.8%

Healthcare

SAUM.L
5.6%
SX5S.L
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

SAUM.L
5.5%
SX5S.L
5.5%

Communication Services

SAUM.L
4.1%
SX5S.L
2.3%

Energy

SAUM.L
3.9%
SX5S.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

SAUM.L
3.7%
SX5S.L
3.7%

Real Estate

SAUM.L
1.0%
SX5S.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUM.L
SAUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5S.L
SX5S.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAUM.LSX5S.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.62

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

5.40

+1.09

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUM.L and SX5S.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAUM.LSX5S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.23

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.69

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Drawdowns

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, roughly equal to the maximum SX5S.L drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and SX5S.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAUM.LSX5S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-32.54%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-11.43%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-13.85%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-21.71%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.57%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-5.44%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.44%

-0.32%

Volatility

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) is 4.37%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that SAUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SX5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAUM.LSX5S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.90%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

12.23%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

15.09%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

17.62%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

19.88%

-0.87%

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SAUM.L nor SX5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SAUM.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SAUM.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAUM.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAUM.L and SX5S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer