SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L
SAUM.L (iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and SX5S.L (Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAUM.L returned 10.39%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for SX5S.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAUM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SX5S.L.
Performance
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SAUM.L is traded in GBP, while SX5S.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SX5S.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than SX5S.L's 6.46% return.
SAUM.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SX5S.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 7.86% | 28.60% | 4.78% | 17.25% | -7.39% | 14.31% | 6.03% | 18.94% | -3.56% |
SX5S.L Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.46% | 27.68% | 6.13% | 19.91% | -3.67% | 14.48% | 2.12% | 23.51% | -4.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUM.L and SX5S.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SAUM.L and SX5S.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Technology
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Industrials
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Consumer Cyclical
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Utilities
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Healthcare
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Consumer Defensive
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Communication Services
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Energy
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Basic Materials
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
Real Estate
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAUM.L
SX5S.L
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAUM.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.62 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 5.40 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAUM.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.23 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.69 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, roughly equal to the maximum SX5S.L drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and SX5S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUM.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -32.54% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -11.43% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -13.85% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | -21.71% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.57% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -5.44% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.44% | -0.32% |
Volatility
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) is 4.37%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that SAUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SX5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAUM.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.90% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 12.23% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 15.09% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 17.62% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 19.88% | -0.87% |
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SAUM.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAUM.L nor SX5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SAUM.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SAUM.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAUM.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.
Find the right allocation for SAUM.L and SX5S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer