PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYY0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAUM.L is traded in GBP, while LYY0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYY0.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than LYY0.DE's 11.59% return.


SAUM.L

1D
0.58%
1M
5.64%
YTD
7.86%
6M
9.55%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*

LYY0.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.80%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.67%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAUM.L
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.86%28.60%4.78%17.25%-7.39%14.31%6.03%18.94%-3.56%
LYY0.DE
Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc
11.59%14.49%19.11%15.93%-9.29%19.66%11.33%23.14%-3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SAUM.L and LYY0.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.74

The correlation between SAUM.L and LYY0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUM.L
SAUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LYY0.DE
LYY0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LYY0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYY0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAUM.LLYY0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.51

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

4.23

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

16.79

-10.29

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the LYY0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUM.L and LYY0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAUM.LLYY0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.71

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.90

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.89

-0.32

Drawdowns

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than LYY0.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and LYY0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAUM.LLYY0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-25.81%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-6.99%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-19.11%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-19.11%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.50%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-3.56%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

1.77%

+1.35%

Volatility

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYY0.DE) at 3.21%. This indicates that SAUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYY0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAUM.LLYY0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.21%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

8.03%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

10.92%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

13.50%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

14.77%

+4.24%

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LYY0.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAUM.L vs. LYY0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SAUM.L nor LYY0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SAUM.L and LYY0.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SAUM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SAUM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY0.DE.

SAUM.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while LYY0.DE is Global Equities. SAUM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LYY0.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAUM.L and 0.45% for LYY0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAUM.L and LYY0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer